Close

Articles Posted in Jersey City

Updated:

Prior Convictions Unlawfully Preventing Defendants from Testifying at their own Trials

Witness “impeachment” refers to the process of attacking a witness’s credibility and the accuracy of their testimony at trial. The Federal Rules of Evidence and the New Jersey Rules of Evidence both allow the impeachment of a witness’s credibility by use of their prior convictions. However, when the witness is…

Updated:

Criminal Statute Partially Struck Down on First Amendment Grounds

On December 9, 2021 the New Jersey Appellate Division published a decision which struck down a portion of New Jersey’s terroristic threats statute.  In State v. Calvin Fair, the defendant was charged with and convicted of terroristic threats.  On appeal, Defendant argued constitutional over breadth regarding N.J.S.A. 2C:12-3(a).  Said section…

Updated:

Sentencing Beyond a Jury’s Verdict

In New Jersey, a criminal defendant’s right to a jury trial is guaranteed by both the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the State Constitution. The principles of fairness and justice are encompassed in the roles assigned to the judge and the jury. The jury, otherwise known as…

Updated:

Supreme Court Deals with IEC Claim in Jersey City Homicide Case

Ineffective assistance of counsel is a claim that a criminal defendant may assert when their defense attorney’s inadequate representation constitutes a violation of their Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, not all cases concerning an attorney’s unsatisfactory performance entitle a…

Updated:

Can Invoking The Right to Counsel Be Construed As An Inference of Guilt?

No, a defendant’s right to have an attorney present during interrogation is guaranteed by both the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona. Accordingly, any statements made during the interrogation of a defendant in custody may be admissible as evidence only…

Updated:

Erroneous Jury Instructions: A Recipe for Unjust Verdicts

Jury instructions are directions from a judge to the jury that provide guidance in their deliberations to reach a verdict. These instructions are meant to help jurors understand the applicable laws and how they should assess the facts of the case. Sadly, there are instances where such instructions are flawed…

Updated:

A Balancing Act: The Rights of the Accused v. The Rights of the Alleged Victim

The process of criminal pretrial discovery, which involves an exchange of information between parties, is guided by specific rules and limitations. Protective orders, for example, may limit what information is provided to the opposing party or to whom such information may be provided. Although restricting information may seem like a…

Updated:

Voir Dire: Revealing or Creating Bias in Prospective Jurors?

Voir dire, which means “to speak the truth” in French, also refers to the examination of prospective jurors to determine whether or not they are suitable for jury service. During this jury selection process, a judge may ask standard questions to excuse anyone deemed incapable of serving on a jury.…

Contact Us