Close

Articles Posted in Criminal Attorney

Updated:

New Jersey Supreme Court Ruling Shapes Discovery Obligations For Criminal Defense Attorneys in Hudson County and Beyond

The Supreme Court of New Jersey’s decision in State v. Isaiah J. Knight offers a nuanced examination of the limits of reciprocal discovery in criminal cases, particularly focusing on the circumstances surrounding an affidavit recanting a witness’s previous identification of the defendant as the perpetrator of a crime. The facts…

Updated:

Hudson County Criminal Lawyer’s Analysis of Recent Eyewitness Identification Decision

In a landmark decision that underscores the evolving landscape of criminal law, the New Jersey Supreme Court in State v. Brandon M. Washington set forth new guidelines aimed at enhancing the reliability of eyewitness identification, a pivotal issue in criminal defense, especially in jurisdictions like Jersey City. The ruling reflects…

Updated:

Navigating the Complexities of Witness Tampering Laws: Insights from a Jersey City Criminal Defense Attorney

In a landmark decision, the New Jersey Supreme Court provided critical insights into the state’s witness tampering statute through the case of State v. William Hill. This case scrutinized the boundaries of lawful communication and witness intimidation, posing significant implications for criminal defense strategies. The core of the dispute revolved…

Updated:

Understanding the NJ Supremes’ Decision in State v. Roberson Burney

Summary Cell tower evidence is frequently used in criminal cases. The New Jersey Supreme Court recently issued a pivotal decision in the case of State v. Roberson Burney, a case dealing with complex issues of evidence admissibility and the potential for cumulative error during a trial. The Court ruled that…

Updated:

Attorney Steve Natoli Wins Appeal, Vacating Client’s Conviction and 23 Year Prison Sentence

Attorney Stephen Natoli successfully argued before a three-judge panel that his client’s rights had been violated during a 2019 trial handled by prior counsel.  Following the trial, Defendant was sentenced to twenty-three (23) years in prison.  He had been serving his prison sentence when he retained Mr. Natoli for his…

Updated:

Invocation of Your Right to Counsel: How Concise Must Your Request for Counsel Be?

Under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and the laws of New Jersey, suspects are entitled to have an attorney present while they are held in custody for questioning. But how explicit must your request for counsel be? In State v. Laura Gonzalez, the Supreme Court of New…

Updated:

Protective Sweeps: An Exception to the Warrant Requirement

Although the United States Constitution and the New Jersey Constitution reflect the importance of the fundamental right to privacy, there exists a few doctrines which allow for warrantless search of a home. One such exception to the warrant requirement is the protective sweep doctrine. The United States Supreme Court determined…

Contact Us